Cited by 42Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and InhibitionGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS IN THE SHELL OF THE LIVING BRACHIOPOD LINGULA

McCONNELL, DUNCAN·1963·Geological Society of America Bulletin

Abstract

Research Article| March 01, 1963 INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS IN THE SHELL OF THE LIVING BRACHIOPOD LINGULA DUNCAN McCONNELL DUNCAN McCONNELL Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar GSA Bulletin (1963) 74 (3): 363–364. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1963)74[363:ICITSO]2.0.CO;2 Article history received: 07 Aug 1962 first online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation DUNCAN McCONNELL; INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS IN THE SHELL OF THE LIVING BRACHIOPOD LINGULA. GSA Bulletin 1963;; 74 (3): 363–364. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1963)74[363:ICITSO]2.0.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Abstract Lingula, a living brachiopod, has a shell composed of organic substances and an inorganic substance which is crystallochemically identical with francolite, a carbonate fluorapatite. X-ray powder diffraction photographs are essentially identical for central and marginal portions of the shell and resemble those of synthetic carbonate hydroxyapatite and human dentin (Pl. 1, fig. 1). These microcrystalline substances evidently are composed of a single inorganic crystalline phase. Fossil inarticulate brachiopods may have been accumulators of fluorine as well as phosphorus. This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access. First Page Preview Close Modal You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1130/0016-7606(1963)74[363:icitso]2.0.co;2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
McCONNELL, D.
Corresponding author
McCONNELL, DUNCAN
Venue
Geological Society of America Bulletin
Published
1963
Volume
74
Issue
3
Pages
363
ISSN
0016-7606 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011096256
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geological Society of America Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Keywords
Lingula, brachiopod shells, francolite, carbonate fluorapatite, hydroxyapatite, fluorine accumulation, phosphorus, fossil brachiopods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review